Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 108% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |