FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |