FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro WX 4150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7150 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 4150, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7150
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tonga | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |