GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro WX 4150, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 6001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |