GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 5397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
160−170
medium / 768p
170−180
130−140
ultra / 1080p
95−100
70−75
QHD / 1440p
50−55
40−45
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
130−140
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
70−75
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
75−80
medium / 1080p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 37% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
80−85
65−70
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
50−55
35−40
medium / 768p
30−35
21−24
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
GF100
Polaris 11
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
1 March 2017
Pipelines
352
896
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1053 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
