GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro WX 4150, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro WX 4150.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 2992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK106 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |