GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When comparing GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 4150, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 65% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 51% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |