Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |