Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Tesla T4
When choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Turing |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 254.4 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |