GeForce 940M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940M and Radeon Pro WX 5100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940M stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 5100, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 359 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 940M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 940M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 940M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | Ellesmere |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | 250 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 940M vs Quadro K1100M
- GeForce 940M vs FirePro V4900
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro K1100M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs FirePro V4900
- GeForce 940M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce 940M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics