GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When comparing GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon Pro WX 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 97% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 723 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
| Architecture | GT2xx | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GS1 | Ellesmere |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 | 18 November 2016 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 713 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 121.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |