GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX230 and Radeon Pro WX 5100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX230 and Radeon Pro WX 5100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX230 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 806 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- GeForce MX230 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce MX230. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX230 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N17S-G0 | Ellesmere |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 256 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX230 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- GeForce MX230 vs Quadro M520
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro M520
- GeForce MX230 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce MX230 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics