Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro WX 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 4x DisplayPort |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1528 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 111 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Ellesmere |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics