Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When comparing Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 32 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N14P-Q3 | Ellesmere |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 250 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K2000M vs GeForce GTX 280
- Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 280
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Quadro K2000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro K2000M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics