Quadro M2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon Pro WX 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2200 and Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M2200 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro M2200 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N17P-Q3 | Ellesmere |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Transistor count | 1870 Million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 580
- Quadro M2200 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 580
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Quadro M2200 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro M2200 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics