Quadro M620 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
In this comparison between Quadro M620 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M620 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M620 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 305 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Quadro M620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M620. |
Full Specs
Quadro M620 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1018 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M620 vs Quadro K5100M
- Quadro M620 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro K5100M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
- Quadro M620 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro M620 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics