Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 5100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 17 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Oland |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 18 November 2016 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620