Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 M385
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R9 M385, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R9 M385 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M385. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN |
Code name | Ellesmere | Strato |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 November 2016 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M