Quadro P4200 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro P4200 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 9100, check out specs charts below.
Radeon PRO WX 9100
Quadro P4200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P4200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P4200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P4200 | Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 9100 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro P4200.
- Quadro P4200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P4200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P4200 is 15 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 9100.
- Quadro P4200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P4200 is 5242 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 9100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| low / 720p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Metro Exodus is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro P4200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P4200 | Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 May 2018 | 10 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7132 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |