GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 569 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
G9x
Vega
Code name
N10E-GS1
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
7 January 2018
Pipelines
64
1280
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
80.88
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price