GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 180% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 311 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
55−60
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
9−10
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega
Code name
GT200
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
7 January 2018
Pipelines
192
1280
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
80.88
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price