Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2000M stacks up against Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
IGP
Memory type
DDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 18% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 186 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
3−4
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
4−5
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
5−6
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
90−95
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
21−24
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
10−12
80−85
medium / 1080p
3−4
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
10−12
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
5−6
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
5−6
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
130−140
medium / 768p
8−9
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
N14P-Q3
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
7 January 2018
Pipelines
384
1280
Core clock speed
745 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
80.88
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price