Quadro K620M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
When comparing Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 116% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 98 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
7−8
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
GM108
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 March 2015
7 January 2018
Pipelines
384
1280
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
80.88
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price