FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing FirePro M6000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 16% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro M6000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro M6000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro M6000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 83% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | Oland |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |