FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro V5800 has 48% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 40 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 44% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Juniper | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |