FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro W8100 has 340% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 94 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 812% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro W8100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro W8100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Hawaii | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |