GeForce 920A vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 224 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2598 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 54% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 104% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208B | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |