GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 212% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 235 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 920MX and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |