GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 665 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 3400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620