GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 305 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 5400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620