GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 570 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2900 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 88% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |