GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 105 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |