GeForce GTX 850M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 11% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- GeForce GTX 850M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15P-GT | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |