GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 214 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 117% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 260% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |