GRID K160Q vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GRID K160Q has 160% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2818 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 26% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 17% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Oland |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |