GRID K260Q vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 15 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 180% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |