Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 430 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 88% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 24% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620