Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 430 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 153% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 104% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620