Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe MAX Graphics will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 334 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 670
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620