Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 3000M stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 280 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |