Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro 4000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 4000M has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 4000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 255 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 26% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |