Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 5010M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 5010M stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 280 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3300 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |