Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 130 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |