Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 4800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 128 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |