Quadro K1100M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K1100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| Quadro K1100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |