Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Quadro K2200M has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 63 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 412 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 117% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 260% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |