Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1000M stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 25% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 263 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 193% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Oland |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |