Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 36 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 908 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 525% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 300% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 487% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 222% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 557% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17P-Q3 | Oland |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1870 Million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |