Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 845 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 3400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N19P-Q3 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Quadro K2000M
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620