Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 113% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 54% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 104% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Code name | Oland | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Check Price |